Decoding Memento:
A Chance to test your understanding of Narrative Theory

Memento (2002), directed by Chrisptopher Nolan, takes us into typical film noir territory, following solitary insurance investigator, Leonard Shelby (Guy Pearce) from motel to diner to car lot as he attempts to discover the identity of the man who raped and murdered his wife. So far, so noir, except that Shelby has total short term memory loss and can only remember who is is or what he is doing for a few minutes at a time. This is confusing enough for him, but even more so for the audience, who are plunged into the chaos of Shelby's world with a narrative that unspools backwards (apart from a sub-plot involving a telephone conversation between Shelby and an unseen other which runs forwards - but that's in black and white). We begin at the end, with Shelby's character seemingly achieving his goal, and then unravel his tortuous route to that point.

Huh?

It's a difficult film to watch, certainly. You have to pay attention. And you also have to decode the narrative codes furiously, just to keep up.

So, it's a useful exercise to take notes as you go along. Just like Shelby, in fact, although tattooing them on your body might be going a bit far in your dedication to the subject. You will need to take notes under these headings in order to answer the question below. For each segment, try to jot down the following

Leonard Shelby shows off his study skills

    • The question/answer part of that segment (action/enigma codes)
    • The Memento - the significant object (eg photograph, gun) which carries us through
    • Who the characters are and the functions they perform (eg Donor) - note how this changes
    • What is the conflict central to each segment - is it resolved? Who is the conflict between and how are they represented?
    • Significant other things - costume, setting, cars - what other things do you use to infer meaning?

Your task:

How do audiences decode the narrative of Memento?

Organisation of your answer

Essay form - somewhere between 800 and 1000 words is good. If you're stuck for ideas try this structure.

Introduction

What is the decoding process? How do audiences engage in it consciously/unconsciously? Why does the narrative of Memento present problems?

Main body paragraphs

In the order that you think is appropriate, you should write a paragraph on each of the following

  • Memento and Todorov - how do the film-makers play with the audience's expectation of the equilibrium, disequilibrium, new equilibrium pattern?
  • Memento & Barthes - how do action and enigma codes work within the segments - that whole question answer patter? How do they help drive the narrative on?
  • Memento & Propp - What are our expectations of character? How doe characters' functions change when seen in reverse? What is going on with Natalie?!?!
  • Memento & Levi-Strauss - What binary oppositions are present in the film, and how do they help our understanding of it? How does the audience's grasp of right/wrong change? (Clue: make strong connections between this paragraph and the one on Propp)
  • Memento and Symbolic Codes - Each sequence has a memento - a significant object whcih provides a link forward and back. How do these objects help us understand the narrative ie how can they be said to help construct it?

Conclusion:

How DO audiences decode the narrative of "Memento"? It seems so complicated... and yet, by the end it all makes sense. Why is this?

Length: 800-1000 words

Due in: Friday 26 September

Further reading - Memento Links

All the interviews specifically ask about narrative structure, so they are well worth reading.

 

 

Post A Message!!